| |
Almost everyone has an innate tendency for good health and
many people recover naturally from functional mental disorders.
This has been reported to occur among about one in three psychiatric
patients suffering the milder forms of disorder while they are waiting for
a first appointment.
Possible reasons include a
determination
to recover and the right kind of support from family,
friends, colleagues and so on. An unexpected change of circumstances
may also help. |
M.J. Lambert 'Spontaneous remission in adult neurotic disorders: a revision and summary' pp
107-119 Psychological Bulletin 83
|
Psychotherapy:
a holistic approach |
But
the other two of the three may need more dedicated help from
someone who specialises in helping people with mental disorders by means of psychotherapy, a word derived from the ancient Greek (psyche
= mind; therapeia = service) and a holistic approach to
functional mental disorders. |
|
|
The nature of psychotherapy |
Partly because of its association with Sigmund Freud and psychoanalysis,
psychotherapy is often regarded as a medical treatment, but the
the function of psychotherapy practicians differs from that of
their medical counterparts because it does not comprise systematic
diagnoses, categorisation and standardised treatments.
Instead, their function comprises helping clients unravel the causes of their
disorder so that they, the clients, can decide how best to deal with
them.
'Psychotherapy facilitates the remission of symptoms. It
not only speeds up the natural healing process but also often
provides additional coping strategies and methods for dealing with
future problems.' |
M.J. Lambert & A.E. Bergin 'The
effectiveness of psychotherapy' in Handbook of psychotherapy and
behavior change. A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (eds) 4th Edn,
Wiley, New York 1994 |
| |
Psychotherapy
is not an easy option and, because it
is not based on a universally acknowledged body of knowledge, it
cannot legitimately be described as a 'learned profession' with a
career structure.
Moreover, it is not a mysterious or magic cure
and (pace Freud) it is not a science, but a craft!
Simply, it involves one or more
structured conversations during which client and practician explore
the client's mental, psychological, emotional, spiritual or
existential difficulties and possible ways of resolving them. |
|
|
Not counselling |
Confusion
tends to arise because
psychotherapy is sometimes called 'counselling' which, although similar
in some ways, consists largely of offering advice and/or consolation and
comfort, whereas psychotherapy only offers solace when clients are
deeply distressed
and rarely includes casual conversation
because its main aim is to help clients determine the
best way of dealing with their difficulties by learning more about
themselves and their circumstances
as a basis for self-help; perhaps
also, as part of that process to search
for their real personality instead of the false version with which their
culture may have invested
them. |
|
|
Symptoms |
Psychotherapy practicians attach little or no significance to the mental
illness categories used by many psychiatrists. Instead, they
encourage clients to concentrate on their reasons for seeking help —
such as unwanted
addictive
or anti-social behaviour; chronic depression; self-harm or suicidal
thoughts; anxiety; breathlessness; poor concentration; difficult relationships; emotional isolation; forgetfulness; frequent
headaches, indigestion, infection or skin problems; hearing
voices; irritability; lack of confidence; nightmares;
panic attacks; poor appetite, poor sleep or sleep terrors ... |
'... life itself is the best therapist.
What (psycho) analysis can do is to make one able to accept the help
that life offers and to profit from it.’ (Karen Horney, p. 211
Self-Analysis. W.W. Norton & Co., New
York & London 1968) |
|
Procedure |
When client and practician have
established the reason(s) why the client needs help, the practician is likely to
suggest that they decide which needs to be addressed first,
while
allowing for the fact that the client may later wish to change the order
of priority. |
|
|
Team work |
Once these
or other
symptoms of disorder have been clearly identified, client and practician
behave as fellow workers and try to tease out the underlying causes so that they can then discuss possible ways of removing or
modifying them — and even perhaps in the most difficult cases
of learning to adapt to them!
The practician's main function is then to try to see the client's
situation as the client sees it and to feel as the client feels about
it. S/he may then be better able to understand and
perhaps challenge any fixed way of thinking that the client seems .to
have developed as a result of incidents and circumstances that the client
either imagined or truly experienced.
|
|
|
Two analogies |
Karen
Horney once compared psychoanalysis to climbing a difficult mountain,
guided by someone who is not too certain of the way because, although
experienced in mountain climbing, s/he has not climbed this particular
mountain before.
Another analogy would be that of a research
project in which the main topic of enquiry is the client's
confused state. |
p. 14
Self-Analysis. W.W. Norton & Co., New York & London 1968 |
| |
As Sol L. Garfield pointed out, the
efficacy of psychotherapy does
not depend only or even primarily on what practician and client discuss in their
meetings, but on what the client does or perhaps fails to achieve between
their meetings, because the purpose of their meetings is mainly to
provide opportunities to discuss what the client has found or
thought about since the previous meeting, thus comparable to
seminars or tutorials.
'Whoever acquires knowledge and
does not practise it resembles him who ploughs his land and leaves
it unsown.' |
'Eclectic
Psychotherapy' p.177 in Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration.
John C. Norcross & Marvin R. Goldfried (eds)] Basic Books, New York 1992
Sa'di Gulstan, 1258 CE
|
|
Possible drawbacks of psychotherapy |
During the
psychotherapeutic process, clients may discover
some unwelcome truths about themselves and thereby incur distress that they
had not anticipated! For example, the practician may suggest that progress towards a solution is being
obstructed by one or more of the client's firmly-held beliefs; or s/he may question whether
the client's plan of action will achieve its objective, thus prompting
the client to feel resentment or, at best, extreme disappointment. Such
risks cannot be avoided if the psychotherapeutic process is to have a
positive outcome.
The practician will probably have warned the client of the
possibility and, if it arises, do
what s/he can to soften the impact so that it can be more easily absorbed.
Even if
it strains
their relationship, the practician's moral duty entails upholding their
contract.
|
|
|
Further
caution |
Psychotherapy
will not relieve
the symptoms of mental disorder if there is any reason to suppose that the
underlying cause is physical. In such cases, intending clients should seek medical advice before
considering
psychotherapy. They can reasonably assume that their
disorder is
mental only if no physical cause has been established; but the doctor,
like the patient,
should distinguish
clearly between
physical and non-physical symptoms.
Depression, anxiety, morbid thoughts,
irritability, phobias and nightmares, for example, are mental, not
physical, symptoms.
|
|
|
Importance
of
tenacity |
Because it is based on the principle
of self-help, psychotherapy is unlikely to help people who want relief from
their suffering
without incurring real effort or risk. For the process to be
worthwhile, clients must be prepared to question their
beliefs and try out new ideas. If they falter and question whether it is worth continuing, the practician will probably try to encourage them by pointing out any progress they have already
made, but
s/he will not subject them to undue pressure to continue.
|
|
| |
Whether psychotherapy is successful or not, the process ends when clients,
unprompted, decide
they have all the information and ability they need to continue
unassisted by a practician.
If they later regret their decision, they will none the less be able
begin again from where they left off,
without fear of reproof. |
|
|
Efficacy
of psychotherapy |
The efficacy of
psychotherapy has often, and rightly, been questioned.
Measurement is difficult because the cases of people who have found it helpful
and the cases of those who have not found it helpful are
seldom recorded by public health services. Also,
because the objectives of medical intervention and psychotherapy differ, attempts to measure their
comparative efficacy are unrealistic.
In medicine, for example, efficacy is usually measured by a reduction of
patients' symptoms. Such factors as the ability to maintain a steady
job and/or a network of personal relationships tend to be overlooked. |
|
| |
Another factor
limiting accurate measurement is that the meaning of the word 'efficacy' varies from person to person and
from situation to situation. What, for instance, was the therapy
intended to achieve? Was the objective realistic?
Who decided the objective: the client, the consultant, or
the client's advisers?
|
|
| |
All we can realistically
do is compare the proportion of people who we know have been helped by
psychotherapy with the proportion of those who we know were not! On this
crude criterion, reviews of many reported studies, such
as the following, suggest that
psychotherapy works at least as well as other remedies.
| J. Meltzoff & M.
Kornreich Research in Psychotherapy . Atherton, New York 1970 |
|
M.
L. Smith, G. V. Glass & T. I. Miller The Benefits of Psychotherapy .John
Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1980 |
|
G.
Andrews & R. Harvey 'Does psychotherapy benefit neurotic patients? A
re-analysis of the Smith, Glass & Miller data' pp1203-1208 in Archives of
General Psychiatry 38 (1981) |
| M.
J. Lambert The Effects of Psychotherapy, Volume 2. Human Sciences Press, New
York 1982 |
| M. J.
Lambert, D. A. Shapiro & A. E. Bergin: 'The effectiveness of psychotherapy'
pp 157-212 in Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change S. L.
Garfield & A. E. Bergin (eds)] Wiley, New York 1986 |
|
A.
E. Bergin & M. J. Lambert: 'The evaluation of outcomes in psychotherapy'
pp139-189 in Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change [S. L. Garfield &
A. E. Bergin (eds)] Wiley, New York 1986 |
|
Michael
J. Lambert: 'Psychotherapy outcome research' pp 94-129 in Handbook of
Psychotherapy Integration. John C. Norcross & Marvin R. Goldfried (eds)]
Basic Books, New York 1992 |
| A.
E. Bergin: 'Further comments on psychotherapy research and therapeutic practice'
pp 317-323 in Interpersonal Journal of Psychiatry 3 |
|
|
| |
Interestingly, two separate studies of people who were
'clinically-depressed' showed that 'the changes in functional brain
activity following pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy were remarkably
similar.' |
Harold
A. Sackheim, p. 650 Archives of General Psychiatry vol. 58 part 7 (July 2001) |